The compliance conversation is no longer limited to policy documents and periodic checks. As markets become more digital, regulators are paying closer attention to how firms run daily workflows, manage data, supervise third parties, and maintain control during disruption. Current industry guidance already shows that operational gaps, broken systems, and weak data flows can damage efficiency, service quality, and risk control, which is why firms are being pushed toward end-to-end transformation supported by automation, stronger governance, and better operating models.
For leaders responsible for asset management operations, 2026 should be treated as a readiness deadline rather than a distant milestone. In Europe, digital operational resilience rules are already in force, and supervisory priorities for 2026 include investment-management oversight, integrated supervisory data collection, compliance and internal-audit reviews, liquidity and leverage monitoring, and continued focus on sustainability-related risks such as greenwashing. In the United States, investment advisers remain expected to maintain written compliance procedures, assign accountable oversight, and review those controls annually.
Build Compliance Into the Operating Model
The strongest firms will not treat compliance as a layer added after operations are designed. They will build it directly into the operating model. That means connecting front-office onboarding, due diligence, portfolio setup, trade controls, post-trade reviews, reconciliations, and reporting into one governed flow instead of leaving teams to work across fragmented systems. The reference framework for capital markets operations highlights exactly these control points, from KYC and trade compliance to investment accounting, reference data, corporate actions, reconciliations, dashboards, and reporting.
This approach matters because regulators increasingly examine whether controls actually work in practice, not whether they merely exist on paper. A process that depends on manual handoffs, spreadsheet fixes, or unclear ownership is more likely to fail under scrutiny.
Data Quality Must Become a First-Line Control
Data quality is now a compliance issue, not just an operations issue. Supervisory bodies are signaling continued focus on integrated reporting, data standards, and improved collection of supervisory information. At the same time, the operating model described in the source material places data strategy, data quality, and governance at the center of modernization.
That means firms should map every critical data element tied to valuation, client reporting, trade records, ESG disclosures, and reconciliations. They should also define ownership, set validation rules, and maintain an audit trail that explains where data originated, how it changed, and who approved it. In 2026, the ability to prove data integrity may matter as much as the data itself.
Third-Party Risk and Resilience Need Stronger Oversight
Regulatory resilience also depends on how well firms manage vendors, platforms, and outsourced processes. International guidance on operational resilience stresses written business continuity planning, annual reviews, updates after material operational change, and stronger oversight of outsourcing, information security, disaster recovery, inspection rights, and termination planning.
This is especially important as more firms adopt automation tools, cloud-based workflows, and specialist service providers. Every dependency should be documented, tested, and linked to a fallback process.
What Good Preparation Looks Like Now
A practical 2026 plan starts with a control-by-control review of onboarding, trading, post-trade processing, reporting, data governance, and vendor oversight. From there, firms should simplify workflows, automate repeatable controls, strengthen documentation, and run scenario testing for system failure, cyber disruption, reporting errors, and liquidity stress. The goal is simple: create an operating environment where compliance is continuous, visible, and defensible. That is what regulatory resilience will mean in the next cycle.
About the Author
